• Photography Ads

  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Future Topics

    White Balance
    Assignment Photography
    Photo Acute and other Software
    HDR
    Manipulations
    3D
    A Life Shot in B&W
    Breaking the Rules
    Through The Viewfinder (TTV)
    Lomo
    Experimentation
    Photojournalism
    Photographing People
    Making a Business of it
    The "Standard" Shot
    As Time Passes
    Meetups
    Elements
  • Most popular posts

  • Tags

    Abstract Advice Aircraft Landing American Eagle Backlighting Buying Canna Lily Canon Cellphone Cameras Creative Depth Stacking Diffusion Digital Camera E66 equipment Fall Colors Fiber Optics Fill Flash Flash Gear Handheld HDR Insect Just in Time Lighting Long Exposure Macro Mosaic Mutliple Opinion Panorama Picture365 Portraits RSS Rules Shadow Space Special Effects Stitching Sunset Technique Telephoto Venetian Blinds Yosemite Zoom
  • « | Home | »

    Cellphone Cameras, N97 First Impressions

    By sirsnapalot | July 9, 2009

    If you read this blog, you know I’m fairly critical of cellphone cameras. I haven’t tried a lot of models, and since I work for Nokia, I’m most likely to try those models over another, simply due to availability. I recently started using an N97, and the first thing I wanted to do was try out the camera.

    Nokia N97

    Nokia N97

    Nokia, in my opinion, has done a better job than a lot of cellphone manufacturers in not playing the megapixel game as much, especially Samsung, whom I find reprehensibly touts 10 and 12mp cellphone cameras (which by the laws of physics cannot produce that resolution with so small a lens).

    And Nokia has tried to do well by using Carl Zeiss optics on their high-end models, with noticeably bigger apertures. All this goes into producing, or theoretically producing the best possible images for such a small device. Except for one thing- Nokia devices do not let you control image quality. Yes, they have a quality setting, but all it does is change the size of the image, not the JPEG quality.

    My recommendation to Nokia (my employer, as stated), would be to offer a true quality setting, or even a RAW setting of sorts (go ahead an warn the user that a high setting will slow down the rate at which they can take pictures)- but give the user the choice. If we are going to spend $700 on an N97, at least give us an option.

    So- on to the first impressions. I carried the camera out with me on a run the other evening. This first picture was just around the corner from my house. I must say, compared to the N95, the color is much better- very good saturation, considering that it’s a cellphone.

    N97 Evaluation

    N97 Evaluation

    Also, I’ve inserted a 1:1 inset to show detail. At least on objects closer to me, the detail seems pretty good, as seen here.

    A second picture was taken of a small strip center down the street:

    N97 Evaluation

    N97 Evaluation

    I’ve also included a 1:1 inset here, but from the background. As you can see here, the below-average compression settings just obliterate the details. I think the resolution in this camera is decent, and the color saturation quite good- I just wish I could choose a higher JPEG quality setting. All that said, it is still probably one of the better cellphone cameras out there. More to come in a future post.

    Popularity: 24% [?]

    • Share/Bookmark

    Topics: Cellphone Cameras, Review | No Comments »

    Comments